The Prison-Education Connection

November 2, 2009 | Blog

An article in today’s Chronicle Review covers a surge of scholarly interest in “prison studies.” The author does a nice job of capturing key areas of research on this topic, though coverage of work by Bruce Western, Chris Wildeman, Alice Goffman, Nikki Jones, and Devah Pager would have deepened the portrait. For example, a discussion of Goffman’s recent ethnography of men in Philadelphia could have illustrated how prison life (and the threat of life in prison) is intimately connected with how daily life–outside prison–is experienced by many of today’s young urban men.

I just hope educators are paying attention. It’s far too easy (and common) for scholars to focus on a single societal institution (like schools) to the exclusion of all others. But anyone committed to democratizing education must connect to the conversation on prison reform.

For example, here are two reasons why higher education researchers, practitioners, and policymakers should follow the debates over prisons:

(1) We want to find ways to broaden access to new populations and spread opportunities. Just 2% of those in state prisons and 8% of those in federal prisons have attained any form of college degree.

At least one study has found that after prison, African-American men are more likely to attend college, perhaps because they hope it will protect them from future participation in undesirable activities.

(2) College attendance during prison is associated with lower rates of recidivism (though evidence has not yet established the relationship as a causal one).

It is thus highly disconcerting that several recent education policies have made it more– not less– difficult to use prison time to enroll in postsecondary education and to access college after leaving prison. Consider the following

–Since the reauthorization of the Higher Education Act in 2000, the “aid elimination penalty” has blocked access to aid for adults with drug convictions. By one estimate, this rule has made over 200,000 students ineligible for federal grants, loans, and work study. While the penalty has since been reformed (currently, only students who receive drug convictions during college enrollment and do not pass two unannounced drug tests are ineligible for aid), some suggest that even in its current form it discourages college enrollment (because the financial aid application includes a question about drugs) and perpetuates dropout among vulnerable populations. Wheelock and Uggen write that “relative to whites, racial and ethnic minorities are significantly more likely to be convicted of disqualifying drug offenses and significantly more likely to require a Pell Grant to attend college…It is therefore plausible that tens of thousands have been denied college funding solely on the basis of their conviction status.”

–Since 1994, Pell Grants may not be used to support college course-taking that occurs while in prison, a change that has made college much less affordable for that population. Yet at the same time, the number of state prison systems offering postsecondary education is rising (from 30 in 2002 to 43 in 2003-2004)–in Texas and North Carolina more than 10 percent of all inmates participate in some form of college coursework, typically offered by community colleges.

It’s time for educators to start thinking hard about who isn’t enrolled in their schools, and why. Looking to the ever-growing prison state in this country is a good place to start.

2 Comments

  1. Reply

    Claus von Zastrow

    November 3, 2009

    Thanks for a very thoughtful piece. Politicians who campaign on law-and-order platforms tend to avoid anything that seems to award lawbreakers. So, people who have been convicted of a crime get removed from the voting rolls, stripped of eligibility for scholarships, and generally pushed further to the margins of society.

    Questions of justice aside, this strategy seems to ensure recidivism. Released from prison, former inmates have far fewer opportunities available to them than they did before they were ever convicted. And most had precious few opportunities to begin with. So they turn to crime.

    Current tendencies are perverse. They may satisfy a general vision of justice, but they fuel the very social problems they are meant to correct.

  2. Reply

    Lauren

    November 23, 2009

    Great post. It's unfortunate that lawmakers do not make accessible, affordable education a priority for everyone in the U.S., including prisoners. Even if there's not a proven causal relationship between recidivism and in-prison education, it stands to reason that a college education helps ex-prisoners obtain jobs on the outside, which is essential during the first year of release, when recidivism is most likely to occur.

    Keep up the good work! Your post has definitely helped inspire my next blog post.

    Lauren S
    http://1in100.wordpress.com


Would you like to share your thoughts?

Would you like to share your thoughts?

Leave a Reply

© 2013 The EduOptimists. All Rights Reserved.