Student Learning and Teacher Performance

July 24, 2009 | Blog

Corrected

President Obama and Education Secretary Duncan have drawn a clear line in the sand with regard to evaluating teacher performance: States with laws that restrict the use of student achievement data in employment evaluations — including California, New York and Wisconsin — may be rendered all-but-ineligible for competitive grants, such as Race To The Top funding, in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. Read more in John Dillon’s New York Times story (“Administration Takes Aim At State Laws on Teachers”).

In a speech last month, Secretary Duncan named Wisconsin as a state with such restrictions in place. Wisconsin law 121.02(1)(q) — requires schools boards to “evaluate, in writing, the performance of all certified school personnel at the end of their first year and at least every 3rd year thereafter.” Further, 118.30 2(b)4.(c) restricts the results of student assessments from being “used to evaluate teacher performance, to discharge, suspend or formally discipline a teacher or as the reason for the nonrenewal of a teacher’s contract.” [Kudos to Chris Thorn at the Wisconsin Center for Education Research for rooting out the offending statute in question! I won’t quit my day job.]

Between this restrictive law and the state’s distinction as having the largest black-white achievement gap in reading in the nation, it seems that the state’s chances in the Race To The Top competition are very poor. In a recent post, I gave Wisconsin 30-1 odds. Let’s make it 50-1.

The U.S. Department of Education today has released draft rules that will govern the competition for and allocation of competitive ARRA dollars. This information is available at www.ed.gov/recovery. (For great early analysis, go to Teacher Beat.)

2 Comments

  1. Reply

    Chris Thorn

    July 24, 2009

    I'm afraid they are correct. It is 118.30 4(c) which reads as follows:

    "(c) The results of examinations administered under this section to pupils enrolled in public schools, including charter schools, may not be used to evaluate teacher performance, to discharge, suspend or formally discipline a teacher or as the reason for the nonrenewal of a teacher's contract."

    http://www.dpi.wi.gov/oea/wsaslaw.html
    or
    http://www.legis.state.wi.us/statutes/Stat0118.pdf

  2. Reply

    Liam Goldrick

    July 24, 2009

    Thanks, Chris. You've found what no one else, myself included, has apparently been able (or willing) to identify.


Would you like to share your thoughts?

Would you like to share your thoughts?

Leave a Reply

© 2013 The EduOptimists. All Rights Reserved.